bedsitter23: (Default)
Twenty years ago I used to write loud broadsides about pop music.  My goal was to say outrageous things and offend as much as possible.

Like Bob Dylan, I haven't slowed down, my quality is undiminished, and I am still the best in my field.

Behold my Proclamation! 

Music was terrible in 2013 and your favorite song was gawdaful.

(Unless your favorite song was "Get Lucky".  That one was actually pretty good).

The vitriol starts now.

My biggest complaint for 2013 was “Royals”.  What a terribly boring song.  Still, that’s not my biggest issue with it.  I understand that kids these days are ingesting synthetic pot, prescription painkillers or BK SatisFries or whatever to make them like this stuff.  I am just concerned with how serious Lorde is taken.  This song got played on alt-rockstations and commentators said things like “This stunningly written satire on the whole materialistic aspect of 21st Century  culture.”  Wait, what?  Terrible pop song, and nothing more than a pop song.

 

Moving from my ‘unfavorable’ list to ‘favorable’ list in 2013 was Bruno Mars.  Bruno was always the critics’ darling, but only this year did his music match the hype heaped upon him- “The next King of Pop”, the “multi-genre pop champion”.  His singles in 2013 were derivative to be sure (“Locked out of Heaven” isn’t a Police cover?  Let me check the song listing on Zenyatta Montdatta again.) but they were good.

Going in the other direction was Justin Timberlake.   JT has given us some great pop moments but his “black tie” phase was pure Pat Boone.  “The 20/20 experience” was the #1 selling album of the year, but Justin probably sepnt every 2013 night wishing he had done “Blurred Lines”.  At this point,  his music is less interesting than that other Justin, the Beebs.

Not sure why JT’s music has become so bland after once being a solid pop performer, but maybe it’s because the more serious these guys get, the worse the music gets.  I am hardly a Katy Perry fan, but she occasionally can put out a catchy tune.  “Roar” was hopelessly earnest, and one of the most annoying songs of the year.

I have always said that about Eminem, an artist who is better served to be Adam Sandler and not as Malcom X, Muhammad Ali,  Zig Ziglar, or whatever insightful and important personality that he aspires to be.  He seems to have resurrected his career, but his duet with Rhianna “Monsters in my head” is silly in it’s over-importance and like a typical shared Facebook post in its originality.

Of course, Eminem did well for himself, but no African-American went to #1 in 2014.  I would have liked to seen Lil Wayne do it.  “(B*tches) Love Me” was a pretty great song, even if Weezy has become harder and harder to defend.  Despite lyrics  much worse than anything Phil Robertson has ever said, it did go to #9.  It’s impossible to approve of the song’s content - which is offensive as pop gets, so I suppose that is why indie rockers who routinely love Lil Wayne have jumped off his bandwagon.  (They still loved Kanye, they fawned over him as much as ever- but for the first time in years, Kanye didn’t give us anything worth writing home about.  Love him or hate him, his music is usually pretty good, but it’s been awhile since he has had that great song).

On the positive side, Macklemore did make the pop scene a better place with his Outkast-style genre rap.  Pop radio did promote his song about ‘homophobia in rap’ (“Same love”) which was a message that needed heard, but was extremely heavy handed, and how anyone wanted to hear that song more than once is beyond me.

That’s about it.  I guess I should say something about Icona Pop (who I thought were the next in line of snotty British girl bands like the Spice Girls, B*Witched, Girls Aloud, Shampoo and dozens of others, but they are not.  I knew the song was just a bit”Waterloo” in its bad English translation)or the obvious - One Direction.  Still, I have less hate for 1D than I do “serious” bands like Fall Out Boy.  That band would be opening for Poison 20 years ago…I’m not saying I don’t see the appeal , because I do.  It’s just that it is annoying to me.  Know why Imagine Dragons sell as much as Demi Lovato and Selena Gomez?  Because it all sounds the same.  That’s the problem.  Van Gogh had the right idea.

bedsitter23: (Default)
I can't resist the appeal of the Grammys, which truly does feel like music's biggest night, and although Kanye wasn't there, draws the biggest names (I watched the People's Choice Awards and it was easy to tell who was going to win, because they were the only nominees in attendance).

While I don't feel that anything this year will be deposited longterm in my memory bank; it was still worth a look.

Start the complaining now:

- The thing I thought might be the highlight (and likely was) was the Bob Marley tribute featuring Bruno Mars, Sting, and Damian & Ziggy Marley.  The Marley tribute contained some of Bob's biggest songs - "Locked out of Heaven" and "Walking on the Moon".  Oh well.

-Elton sang the &^%$ out of that Ed Sheeran song.  I guess that's not really an opinion on whether that it was good or bad, but damn, he sang the &^%$ out of it.

-Is there any band that screams 'one hit wonder' than the Lumineers.  I don't mind them actually, but they remind me of one of those one-hit bands that flashed when I was a pre-teen.

- The big story, well, it was whether there was going to be sideboob.  After that, it was "Who the hell is Al Walser?"  Walser made the mistake of being nominated in the dance category with better known acts like Skrillex, Swedish House Mafia, and Calvin Harris.

Although the Grammys are terribly predictable.  Someone over at Slate called it "the newest people making the most traditional music", which is spot on.  That means Adele is perfect.  It means fun. is going to win and Gotye's single will fare well.

Personally, I think an award should go to the best musician of the year.  If Neon Piss had the record of the Year (and I could argue they did), then give them the statue  I realize the Grammys never go that obscure, and they have a history of getting it wrong (Not honoring the Beatles, Milli Vanilli's wins, and of course, Jethro Tull).

-I would be ok if fun. fell of the face of the Earth.

-  "Take five" played by Stanley Clarke and Chick Corea was barely recognized as it was used in a quick introduction to Ryan Seacrest (No one cares about Jazz,  So honestly no one really probably gives a damn about Joshua Bell).

-I won't spend much time on it, but Taylor Swift was a country traditionalist a year or two ago.  She is never ever going back to that.

-I really wanted to like Justin Timberlake's performance.  he surely was trying to do the right thing with black-tie soul,  Prince showed him how it was done and symbol-guy didn't even sing a note.

Overall, I wasn't too impressed, there were no performances I'd revisit (I know others may have favorites), but ratings were pretty good, and although I bitch and moan, I still want the Grammys to do well.

Profile

bedsitter23: (Default)
bedsitter23

March 2025

S M T W T F S
      1
2345 678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031     

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated May. 23rd, 2025 02:47 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios