bedsitter23: (Default)
Suede is one of my favorite all-time bands. They have a good five or six albums worth of material that is unbeatable.

In 2011, they started in earnest on doing new material, and this year finds them three albums in. I feel a certain preference to the earlier incarnation, but the reunion is admirable and has produced some worthwhile material, particularly 2016's Bloodsports.

My problem with the first two reunion discs is that they played it fairly safe, sticking to a pretty basic formula. It has worked though as many critics have gave plaudits. The new album The Blue Hour received a cooler reception.

It's a tough call, but there's a lot to like about The Blue Hour. It feels ambitious to an extent the previous records never did. It certainly has a 'kitchen sink' feel that puts it in a category of the band;s greatest works like Dog Man Star.

There are the big choruses and big ballads, and at other times, Richard Oakes is throwin in some Buick McKane fire on songs like "Beyond the Outskirts" and "Cold Hands".

It's hard to review, since I think the critics are essentially right. Bloodsports is a better record. Though, it's somewhat hard to pin down particulars. The most obvious would be that it is three albums in five years, and any band would struggle with that.

It is a different band. Anderson has reached a middle aged contentment, so songs like "Life is Golden" and "Flytipping" would have been great angst-wrenched masterpieces when Anderson was in his late 20s, instead are life-affirming uplifts.

People change and grow, and there's no doubt that these songs will surely sit comfortably with classics on their setlist.

So, I am a bit unclear on how Bloodsports was better. Blue Hour is only slightly longer at a running time of 51 minutes and 2 more songs than the predecessor. Still, with so much drama, perhaps we need a bit of break from time to time. Dog Man Star is even longer yet, but it stretched some songs before going to the next.

The good news is that the ambition here is promising. I wasn't particularly keen on the band from Bloodsports/Night Thoughts endlessly churning out carbon copies of the same type of songs. I am interested in what the Blue Hour band does next. I would recommend a bit of a break (maybe three to four years) and then come back with a latter-day classic.





bedsitter23: (Default)
The few people who come here probably know my affection for the band Suede.

I probably don't need to recap, but I will. Not only are the first three albums solid, but so was every note they made in that time. A two disc set called Sci Fi Lullabies makes up a total of five albums worth of material in four years.

Of course, no band can keep up that pace and as the 90s came to the end, so did Suede. 1999's Head Music is mostly great, though it doesn't get the credit of the band's first work. 2002's A New Morning is not so great. So it was off to the sunset. In 2005, Brett Anderson and Bernard Butler got back together for one album, which was good, and Anderson made a solo career- four albums worth. It's hard to imagine Anderson's solo work is of interest to anyone but his most die-hard fans, but I think it's pretty good.

In 2013, the band reunited and recorded Bloodsports. Bloodsports was well received though given a few years, some of that cheer has dissipated. For me, I enjoyed the album but felt it was a bit of going through the motions. A lot has been made that the album was released at the same time of Bowie's Next Day. Even as a fan, I know that they owe a lot to Bowie, and I have said flippantly that they are trying to remake "Starman" over and over (which is a milder burn than Morrissey's famous quote that "Brett Anderson curses God every day that he wasn't born Angela Bowie".

So it is in 2016 as the release of Blackstar and Bowie' death overshadowed any hype Suede may have had. That aside, Night Thoughts is getting solid reviews, even with places Like Pitchfork that generally don't have any interest in them.

So what are my two cents. Well, Night Thoughts is better than Bloodsports, which is a good thing. It also hits the right mold of capturing Dog Man Star and Coming Up, which is what the band wanted, and certainly makes most sense.


However, I am felt a bit wanting. Not that I should complain, but I feel that they have been there. If this was the first Suede album I had ever heard, I would probably love it. That said, the past work is so good that it is hard to match up. A great reunion album would stand with previous records but offer something different (I am thinking of Echo & the Bunnymen's best reunion records).

The good news is that the media attention will be enough to guarantee future records if the band so chose, and it's not that it's a bad album. I just feel like they got caught up with trying to remake their classic albums, instead of progressing somewhere new.

bedsitter23: (Default)
As you may have heard the Starman, the Dame of Glam is back after an extended absence.

That's right, Brett Anderson has returned.

Suede went out not with a bang but a whimper.

I never found A New Morning in stores, and by the time I had finally given into using Amazon quickly realized why no one talked about this album. It wasn't that good.

Things did seem optimistic for the bands legacy. 2005's reunion of Anderson and Bernard Butler in the Tears lived up to the band's legacy. A couple of years later, Anderson launched a solo career with a self-named debut album. That album pared his band's trademark sound to an intimate vocal and piano mix that still showed his genius.

Anderson is now four albums in and they are rather interchangeable affairs that test the patience of even the most diehard Anderson fan. With no Tears material on the horizon, a Suede Mk 2 reunion would be well received by the band's fans.

In which case, it seems like it has, garnering mostly positive reviews and creating a feud between Robbie Williams and Anderson.

Brett was picking on an easy target (One Direction) and decided to take a run at that band's forefathers. "There has always been crap pop music. I remember when we had all the crap boybands in the 90s — stuff like that has always been around. Record companies don't have the resources to take a gamble, so these pop stars are created by committee."

In which case said crap 90s boy band member Robbie fought back. I am not necessarily a fan of his music, but he has proven time and again that he is as silver tongued as they come.

Any quarter-decent three-chord k***heads could and did get a deal in the 90s. "I won't name names cos it would be unfair on Echobelly, Shed 7, Symposium, Menswear, Sleeper, Hurricane Number 1, Ride, The Bluetones (apart from that one song), Ocean Colour Scene (apart from that one song...hang on, nah, not even that song), Northern Uproar, Chapterhouse, Curve, Salad, Adorable, Cud, Spacehog, Kula Shaker, The Audience, Powder, Kingmaker, Geneva (sub-Suede - can you imagine?). There were a few special indie bands then just as there are in every generation. And just as some pop bands are useless, some are magnificent in every generation. I feel sorry for the people who are too bigoted to appreciate the latter. The world's a lot more exciting with a One Direction in it. And more hearts will genuinely race at a new 1D album than they ever have or will at any Suede album in any time period. Sorry about the truth
So, about the music, then...

Richard Oakes is one of the most underrated people in alternative music, constantly under the shadow of Bernard Butler. I don't think Oakes is the problem here. In fact, I think Oakes (and the band) elevate the songs on this album.

The problem (in my estimation) is Anderson. Half of the album resembles Coming Up big radio style upbeat singles, while the other half sound like Dog man Star's more expansive and stripped down moments. I think the latter actually work better, but the former are probably going to be what the crowd wants.

In any case, the album sounds like 99 monkeys on 99 keyboards forced to listen to the Suede discography on repeat. Even on Headmusic, Suede always seemed to be looking forward. Here, they seem to be looking backward.

That said, I suppose it can be considered a partial return to form. The songs have their moments, and if it should all end tomorrow, it would make a much fitting swansong than Morning. It also would bode well should the gang want to keep going.

Also, Dog Man Star was 20 years ago? Damn. 

Okay, bottom line.  I think fans will generally be happy on the disc's own merits.  It just never quite reaches the heights of the best material or even the Tears album. Anderson never reaches a transcendent moment vocally or lyrically, but he gives a performance that is satisfactory.  Given his penchant for such topics, Anderson probably wishes he had something as good as 1D's "Live While We're Young" to work with.

It's good to have Suede back, though. 



Profile

bedsitter23: (Default)
bedsitter23

March 2025

S M T W T F S
      1
2345 678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031     

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated May. 22nd, 2025 11:05 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios