Oct. 31st, 2011

bedsitter23: (Default)

The big news over the weekend was the Des Moines Register poll results.  There are other polls, sure, but The Register gets credit for being one of the important one.

Little surprise, it showed Herman Cain winning.

Cain          23%
Romney    22%
Paul          12%
Bachmann  8%
Gingrich      7%
Perry           7%
Santorum    5%
Huntsman   1%
Not Sure    15%

Okay, so obviously, it is too close to call between the two top runners, but this is a caucus, so as important as a preference is, a second choice is equally important.

When you add percentage of first and second choices, you get something like this:

Cain           42%
Romney     33%
Paul           21%
Gingrich     20%
Bachmann 16%
Perry          16%
Santorum     9%
Huntsman    3%
 
No big news from the poll, which was four months removed from the last Register poll.  Romney literally has not moved since June (23% then).  Cain appeared to flip positions completely with Bachmann (He had 10% in June.  Chely had 22%).  Ron Paul gained 5 points.  Newt stayed at 7%.  Santorum moved one point, despite trying really, really hard.

Of course, we know today's headlines weren't "That Herman Cain is charismatic, and helluva campaigner" or "Let's take an in-depth look at Herman Cain's financial policy and why it is caught fire".

No, it was "Herman Cain sexually harassed women, and then bought their silence".

What does this mean for Cain?  I have to admit I have no idea.

On would assume, he would drop a few points, but I am not completely convinced.  Republicans like a good 'persecution by liberal media' story and I guess I won't believe his numbers drop until I see it, or more story details come out.

Cain is already reaping the benefits of his recent lead; namely that he doesn't have to go to Iowa anymore.

The swap with Bachmann's place has been a confusing one for me.  I am not surprised that it happened, but I figured it would be from a gaffe from Michele.  Instead, it was more of an inexplicable 'we fell out of love' feeling that happened when Rick Perry joined the race.

Some clue might come from this telling poll question:

What is most important to you:

Experience in Business    71%
Held Elective Office            22%

Also, telling is that Iowans really weren't that in love with Chely after all, and they're likely to turn on Cain, too.

Is your mind made up?:

Could be persuaded to change:   59%
Mind Made Up:                                 25%
No First Choice yet:                         15%

I don't think Michele is quite in 'It's so terrible even the tea party wants her to drop out' territory, but she is probably getting close to that.

Poor Rick Perry looks to be done, even as he bombards Iowa with his ads promising he would lead us to 7.5% percent unemployment.

Ron Paul is in attack mode advising while it's cool to hate on the government, he's been hating government for 20 years.  I think it's pretty effective except that whole part where you realize Ron Paul was old 20 years ago.

I am not convinced that this all means Newt Gingrich becomes the nominee, but he was arguably the best speaker at the recent Iowa Faith & Freedom Coalition forum, and the Register's poll says if Cain's supporters would desert him, 23% would go the Gingrich camp. 

Newt also does well in the 'Person we like the least' polling.

Cain 3%
Santorum 5%
Gingrich 9%
Huntsman 9%
Perry 11%
Paul 12%
Romney 14%
Bachmann 16%

There are plenty of other fun findings.

Tea Party Favorite

Cain 27%
Romney  15%
Paul 13%
Bachmann 10%

Among Men

Cain 26%
Romney 18%

Among women

Romney 27%
Cain 17%

Among under-35's

Romney 27%
Cain 21%
Paul 15%

Among Seniors

Romney 33%
Cain 15%

Among Born Again Christians

Cain 26%
Bachmann 11%
Romney 9%
Santorum 9%
Perry 7%

Definitely going to caucus

Cain 27%
Romney 10%



bedsitter23: (Default)
It was Beggar's Night last night.

Beggar's night is a Des Moines thing (mostly, I guess). It's history was that 'Trick or Treat' ended up with youths soaping windows; so in the 30s, it was thought (to clean things up), they would make it 'Tricks for Treats' and kids would tell jokes in exchange for candy.

I saw a lot of the classics, as well as one Charlie Sheen, two Wolverines, and a Troy Polamalu.

It seems like Buzz Lightyear was popular. As were pirates, cheerleaders, and the Scream mask.

You probably know all the jokes, but here goes.

The most popular joke was : Knock Knock. Who's There. Boo. Boo Who? You don't have to cry about it.

I heard it more than once.

Also:

How do you make a handkerchief dance?

Put a little boogie in it.

Did you hear about the guy who lost his left arm and left leg in an accident?

He's all right now

(This one was from a kid. I wonder if he got it).

Why can't the male ghost have kids?

He has a Hallow (hollow) Weenie


There were two Lady Gaga jokes (from older kids).

How do you wake up Lady Gaga?

Pokerface.

How does Lady Gaga like her meat? )
bedsitter23: (Default)
The Men is a terrible name (and Leave Home is a ripoff name for an album, of course), but they are a pretty good band.

Not that I normally go for the buzz band of the moment, but I am okay with this.

Attempts to categorize this Brooklyn band have included No Wave Noo Yawk noise (Suicide, Sonic Youth), psychedelic/space/krautrock (My Bloody Valentine, Neu!, Spacemen 3) and late 80s alt rock (Dinosaur Jr., Mudhoney, Husker Du, uhhh....Sonic Youth again).

Still, there's an element of Stooges punk too.

Good stuff, regardless.





Profile

bedsitter23: (Default)
bedsitter23

March 2025

S M T W T F S
      1
2345 678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031     

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 9th, 2025 09:34 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios